The post from the Electronic Frontier Foundation is titlted "Apple's Crystal Prison and the Future of Open Platforms" and it makes the case for more open mobile systems to spur innovation. What I want most out of this is for these companies to reduce their process that force us to be locked so much into their systems. A snippet from the post:
Two weeks ago, Steve Wozniak made a public call for Apple to open its platforms for those who wish to tinker, tweak and innovate with their internals.
EFF supports Wozniak's position: while Apple's products have many virtues, they are marred by an ugly set of restrictions on what users and programmers can do with them. This is most especially true of iOS, though other Apple products sometimes suffer in the same way. In this article we will delve into the kinds of restrictions that Apple, phone companies, and Microsoft have been imposing on mobile computers; the excuses these companies make when they impose these restrictions; the dangers this is creating for open innovation; why Apple in particular should lead the way in fixing this mess. We also propose a bill of rights that need to be secured for people who are purchasing smartphones and other pocket computers.
Apple's recent products, especially their mobile iOS devices, are like beautiful crystal prisons, with a wide range of restrictions imposed by the OS, the hardware, and Apple's contracts with carriers as well as contracts with developers. Only users who can hack or "jailbreak" their devices can escape these limitations.
There's certainly some pluses and minuses to opening up the platforms, but right now the carriers and the makers are making many decisions that are much more geared to them than to customers. Openess would force their hand and should drive more flexibility for customers with less lock in.